journal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/259dd/259ddd4c089c381f5a1859673b8fb4a8e4cfb994" alt="dissents"
Analysis
The top 7 dissents of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
Here’s a list of 7 occasions when the outgoing Chief Justice diverged from the majority on conclusion or reasoning during his long tenure
8th Nov 2024
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e716/0e7162b0354ef91ba13a53a0896ee55a54f39101" alt="judgements"
Analysis
The top 10 judgements of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
A subjective list of 10 (plus five bonus mentions) of the outgoing Chief Justice of India’s most important judgements in the Supreme Court
8th Nov 2024
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42bc7/42bc7789522361d0e42f19733a1bcd587cf3cd29" alt=""
Analysis
“Judiciary of Sri Lanka has maintained independence, personalities haven’t mattered”: Justice Arjuna Obeyesekere
SCO spoke to the Sri Lankan Supreme Court judge about arbitration, judicial independence, and law’s influence on society
27th Nov 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68107/6810717b1aff8dfe31b47987ebcb423a3af61749" alt="intimacy relational equality"
Analysis
Unpacking the Right to Intimacy in Supriyo
Even the minority opinion privileged a 'marriage-lite' version of queer union instead of upholding relational equality
8th Nov 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c4d0/2c4d01cf46a1e1619e0e1f2df04768d17eb47dab" alt="Justice S.R. Bhat's Majority in the Marriage Equality Judgement"
Analysis
Marriage Equality Judgement: Overlooking fundamental rights
Justice Bhat’s refusal to uphold the directions to protect LGBTQIA+ persons seems inconsistent with his own understanding of Part III Rights
4th Nov 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63291/63291dac1425fdff44d95c86cf59f069629b6e2d" alt=""
Analysis
Monthly Review: October 2023
October saw the marriage equality judgement, revival of seven-judge benches, Justice Bhat’s retirement and more
3rd Nov 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/940b2/940b2c2e3ba0c10dce4836dadbbc8fa702453f9d" alt="marriage rights"
Analysis
Marriage Equality: The courts were not the right forum to approach
The marriage rights of sexual minorities involve a polycentric dispute that falls squarely within the legislative domain
3rd Nov 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c11aa/c11aa4660c7b72d1182c30ddd5f47348a51714dd" alt=""
Channel
SCO Explains: The plea for marriage equality judgement
A five-judge bench rejected the plea for queer persons right to marry in India. What did the Court say?
23rd Oct 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/146df/146dfaf628e092e1b769c5d37bebf6a78277c77b" alt=""
Channel
Supreme Court Cases on the rights of LGBTQIA+ Persons
We trace the evolution of the rights for Queer persons across 4 landmark judgments, and a 5th pending case before the SC.
17th Jun 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc66f/bc66f9a401fd33e17ba30b0c812ef36fcd032387" alt=""
Analysis
2023 Summer Session Review: Notable Hearings
What key cases were heard during the Supreme Court's summer session? SCO reviews.
24th May 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d46e5/d46e5ba914d0131d27a508dff181035b5c9ef96d" alt=""
Channel
Plea for Marriage Equality Day #10
The petitioners concluded their rejoinder arguments and the Bench reserved judgement.
11th May 2023
Moredata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91191/911915e0f2b7e5b073696eed7fb2fb346ddc0e4e" alt="Same Sex Marriage Equality"
Analysis
Going Beyond Marriage: A Case for Relational Equality
Some of the petitions in the marriage equality case argue for more than the right to marry. They ask for the right to a chosen family.
10th May 2023
Morecases
Plea for Marriage Equality
Decided
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v Union of India
The five-judge bench upheld the validity of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and held that the right to marry is not a fundamental right for queer persons.
MoreLast Updated:
Bench:D.Y. Chandrachud CJI, S.K. Kaul J, S.R. Bhat J, Hima Kohli J, P.S. Narasimha J
Navtej Singh Johar v UOI; Akkai Padmashali v UOI
On September 6th 2018 a five-judge Bench unanimously struck down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, to the extent that it criminalised same-sex relations between consenting adults.
MoreLast Updated: 20180906
Bench:Rohinton Nariman J, D.Y. Chandrachud CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar J, Indu Malhotra J, Dipak Misra CJI