CJI Lalit heard challenges to CAA and Sedition. Justice Chandrachud reiterated the bar on the two-finger test in sexual assault cases.

Sr. Adv. Trideep Pais and Adv. Sanya Kamar further argued that portions of statements against Mr. Khalid were identical to each other.

Sr. Adv. Trideep Pais and the Bench locked horns on whether the Court should evaluate the veracity of evidence while granting bail.

Witness statement unreliable, Sessions Court Judge erred in denying bail to Mr. Khalid, claims Sr. Adv. Trideep Pais.

Sr. Adv. Trideep Pais listed instances where misrepresented facts 'falsely' implicated Mr. Khalid in the 2020 Delhi Riots.

Protests anodize democracy from arbitrary action, however the Court held that there is a need to balance this right with other concerns.

Several cases have been filed under Article 131 particularly in terms of constitutional violations by Central legislations.

Article 131 provides for the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and has a rich constitutional history.

Three must-read articles explaining why there is a distinct challenge to the CAA from the State of Assam

The Indian Union Muslim League relied on recent decisions of the Supreme Court to challenge the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.

The Supreme Court has been hearing petitions against the CAA. Here are some of the major arguments made by the major petitioners.

DESK BRIEF: The Union of India files a response in the CAA case, claiming that the CAA is subjected only to limited (if any) judicial review