“Appealing to prurient interests”: Book bans, the courts, the mob
In an intolerant environment, decisions on book bans are increasingly being taken in bureaucratic offices, city streets and village squares
Analysis
Seizing electronic devices in the absence of proportionality checks violates the right against self-incrimination
13th Dec 2023
MoreAnalysis
DESK BRIEF: Recently, it seems that the prescriptive aspect of Article 19 is only a poetic indulgence when faced with media rights
7th Oct 2023
MoreAnalysis
The Court stayed proceedings under all First Information Reports filed against members of the guild.
15th Sep 2023
MoreAnalysis
Comedian Kunal Kamra argues that the Rules will lead to censorship and overregulation of online content.
26th Jun 2023
MoreAnalysis
Various provisions of the FCRA Act have been challenged as violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.
4th Jun 2020
MoreAnalysis
Five human rights activists arrested in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence under the UAPA Act.
26th Dec 2018
MorePending
N. Ram v. Union of India
The SC will decide if the Union’s ban on the BBC Documentary ‘India: The Modi Question’ violates the rights to free speech and expression.
MoreNext Hearing:
Last Updated:
Bench:Sanjiv Khanna J, M.M. Sundresh J
Decided
Noel Harper v Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld provisions of the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020, which place restrictions on NGOs ability to raise and use foreign funds.
MoreLast Updated: 20211108
Bench:A.M. Khanwilkar J, Dinesh Maheshwari J, C.T. Ravikumar J
In an intolerant environment, decisions on book bans are increasingly being taken in bureaucratic offices, city streets and village squares
A look at one of the SC’s earliest landmark decisions and its fallout warns against an uncritical veneration of our constitutional past