Kevin Sebastian

Kevin interned at the Supreme Court Observer between August and October 2024.

Kevin Sebastian's Posts

Analysis

To speak or not to speak: The lingering question of compelled speech in India

The Indian Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on compelled speech, largely developed through cases relating to cinema halls, is undercooked

Analysis

Supreme Court strikes down rules perpetuating caste based segregation and discrimination in prisons | Judgement Summary

We summarise the 148 page landmark ruling that has directed amendments to prison manuals within three months

Analysis

“Passing the baton”: D.Y. Chandrachud nominates Sanjiv Khanna as the next Chief Justice of India

If the nomination is accepted by the Union, Justice Khanna will serve as India’s 51st Chief Justice from 11 November 2024

Analysis

Monthly Review: September 2024

In September, the Court granted bail to two state ministers and heard cases on the R.G. Kar incident, bulldozer demolitions and child rights

Analysis

Judgement Summary: Supreme Court grants bail to Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji in PMLA case

The SC found Balaji’s incarceration for 15 months without trial to be ‘unreasonable’, given the length of sentence for the alleged offence

Analysis

PMLA and the Supreme Court: A Timeline from Vijay Madanlal

SCO tracks how the Supreme Court may have brought incremental relaxations to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act since 2022

Analysis

In Prem Prakash, the Supreme Court takes another step away from Vijay Madanlal

By drawing on the ‘bail is rule, jail is exception’ proposition in a PMLA case again, the Court may have softened its 2022 interpretation

Analysis

Monthly Review: August 2024

Constitution Bench cases on affirmative action, mining taxes, arbitration and driving licences dominated the Court’s docket in August

Analysis

The large and small of it: the Supreme Court on bench sizes

Two recent dissents raised the question about smaller benches referring matters to larger benches. We look at the Court’s jurisprudence.

Hearing Reports

State’s power to tax to apply retrospectively | Order Summary

Favouring a retrospective effect, the SC noted that a prospective overruling was not “constitutionally just” towards the state governments