Kevin Sebastian
Kevin interned at the Supreme Court Observer between August and October 2024.
Kevin Sebastian's Posts
Analysis
To speak or not to speak: The lingering question of compelled speech in India
The Indian Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on compelled speech, largely developed through cases relating to cinema halls, is undercooked
Analysis
Supreme Court strikes down rules perpetuating caste based segregation and discrimination in prisons | Judgement Summary
We summarise the 148 page landmark ruling that has directed amendments to prison manuals within three months
Analysis
“Passing the baton”: D.Y. Chandrachud nominates Sanjiv Khanna as the next Chief Justice of India
If the nomination is accepted by the Union, Justice Khanna will serve as India’s 51st Chief Justice from 11 November 2024
Analysis
Monthly Review: September 2024
In September, the Court granted bail to two state ministers and heard cases on the R.G. Kar incident, bulldozer demolitions and child rights
Analysis
Judgement Summary: Supreme Court grants bail to Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji in PMLA case
The SC found Balaji’s incarceration for 15 months without trial to be ‘unreasonable’, given the length of sentence for the alleged offence
Analysis
PMLA and the Supreme Court: A Timeline from Vijay Madanlal
SCO tracks how the Supreme Court may have brought incremental relaxations to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act since 2022
Analysis
In Prem Prakash, the Supreme Court takes another step away from Vijay Madanlal
By drawing on the ‘bail is rule, jail is exception’ proposition in a PMLA case again, the Court may have softened its 2022 interpretation
Analysis
Monthly Review: August 2024
Constitution Bench cases on affirmative action, mining taxes, arbitration and driving licences dominated the Court’s docket in August
Analysis
The large and small of it: the Supreme Court on bench sizes
Two recent dissents raised the question about smaller benches referring matters to larger benches. We look at the Court’s jurisprudence.
Hearing Reports
State’s power to tax to apply retrospectively | Order Summary
Favouring a retrospective effect, the SC noted that a prospective overruling was not “constitutionally just” towards the state governments