Channel

What arguments were made in the challenge to the Hijab Ban in Karnataka? What will the Judgement focus on?

On September 27th the Supreme Court will fulfill its commitment and live stream three Constitution Bench proceedings to the public

The Supreme Court heard the Union's defence of the EWS reservations and concluded hearing arguments in the Hijab Ban case

The Supreme Court heard the Union’s defence in the constitutional challenge to EWS reservations and the Karnataka government's arguments in

Union argued that the Hijab Ban promoted equality. In the EWS Challenge, they argued that the 50% reservation limit applied only for SC/STs.

The SC heard extensive arguments in the EWS Reservations and Hijab Ban cases this week. How did the Benches manage their time?

Advocate Shadan Farasat argued that backward classes are more likely to be economically weaker and can't be excluded from EWS Reservations.

Mr. Sondhi claimed the Hijab ban violates the fundamental rights of Muslim women. Prof. Kumar argues EWS Reservations violate Equality Code.